If You Want To Know the Real Reason We Lost...

Its all here in my book I wrote in 2010. No one has written this theory and now it has been proven true. Read it and weep and you will know the real reason why this has happened and why it cannot be fixed, sad to say.

http://www.amazon.com/This-U-S-Citizen-Thoughts-Concerns/dp/1451509979

signed,

This U.S. Citizen

Nice Job American Idiots... You win...

Nice job American idiots...  You win...

You know what, its not really anger I have at all stemming from the loss of Romney's bid for president tonight. It is pure disappointment. Disappointment at half of the American people. Disappointed that the reasons I laid out in my book (featured on the right side of this blog) in 2010 have proven to be correct.  Disappointed that there really may be too few of us who really understand freedom and liberty to make a difference and save the country from the path to ruin. Disappointed that my prediction of a 2012 turnaround did not occur even with the detrimental economic and foreign policies of this administration and the outcry of the people who oppose them. Disappointed that the sleeping giant is really no giant at all. Disappointed that the will of the many can push around the few. Disappointed because the electorate is ignorant. Disappointed that the barbarians at the gates were created inside the gates and have rotted the nation from within.

I'M OUT...

TUSC

Our Long Obama Nightmare Is Almost Over...


By Stella Paul

If you're reading this, you've almost made it through the Obama years.  God knows it hasn't been easy holding on this long.  If you're like me, there were days you felt as if you'd aged ten years, just trying to bitterly cling to your leaky life raft.
Maybe you're one of the 23 million Americans who are unemployed, under-employed, or who have given up looking for work.  Who can blame you for despairing, when two-thirds of the jobs in the last four years have gone to new immigrants, many of them illegals?  But don't worry if, like one out of six Americans, you're sinking into poverty -- after all, Obama assures us that "the private sector is doing fine."
Maybe you or someone you love is serving in our military.  Your lives have been endangered by Obama's disastrous rules of engagement, with 70% of the fatalities in Afghanistan occurring during his term.  Every day, you wake up to a commander-in-chief so indifferent to your needs that he let four American heroes die, unaided, in a seven-hour terror attack in Benghazi.  Making matters unbearably worse, he watched the assault live.  But, rest assured, Obama thinks you make "a pretty good photo op," even if your slaughter is "not optimal."
Or perhaps you lost the business you started with your blood, sweat, and tears, or that your family had nurtured for generations.  Like Bill's Barbecue, an 82-year-old local institution in Richmond, Virginia, you had to fire all your hardworking employees, disappoint your loyal customers, and shut the doors for good.  If you owned one of 200,000 small businesses that vanished between 2008 and 2010, wiping out more than three million jobs, Obama won't be sending you a sympathy card anytime soon.  After all, the ex-community organizer preaches, "... you didn't build that.  Somebody else made that happen."
Are you a doctor who worries about losing your medical practice when ObamaCare roars into full effect?  You spent your youth studying and taking on massive debt for medical school so you could dedicate your life to helping others.  Now, facing 2,700 pages of ObamaCare regulations, you're one of 360,000 physicians who plan on "leaving their practice or taking an early retirement" if ObamaCare stands.  That's 45% of working doctors!  Of course, Obama won't be sorry to see you go.  This is the guy who claims that "... doctors would rather take out tonsils than treat a sore throat because it pays better" and "... doctors would rather cut off legs for $50,000 than take care of a diabetic before it got to this point."
The casualties, the miseries, the torments add up.  One and a half million senior citizens losing their homes to foreclosure...half of college graduates can't find full-time jobs...net worth of families plunging 40%...the ratio of new food stamp recipients to new net jobs skyrocketing to 75 to 1...violent crime up by 18%...America's credit rating downgraded for the first time in history.
And at the center of our nightmare lurks the peculiar character now residing in the people's house at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.  We can see him only through his media-induced saintly glow -- yet we have come to know him all too well.  He shimmers before our disbelieving eyes, a self-described piece of "eye candy" with dead fish hands, framed by Greek columns.
The grieving father of slain Benghazi hero Tyrone Woods described meeting Obama at Andrews Air Force Base, when his son's casket arrived from Libya.  "Shaking hands with him, quite frankly, was like shaking hands with a dead fish. His face was pointed towards me but he would not look me in the eye, his eyes were over my shoulder...I could tell that he was not sorry. He had no remorse."
Several days after the casket ceremony, Obama materialized on The View to modestly proclaim he was there just as "eye candy."  The ladies on The View swooned, but the American people turned away in disgust.  Their dream of hope and change had morphed into a nightmare.  And now, their passionate new dream was to stampede to the voting booth on November 6 and vote the nightmare over.
Predictably, now that Obama is fated to vaporize like a bad dream, the ugliness behind his persona is swarming to the forefront.  His followers threaten us with violence in expensive campaign commercials that degrade anyone who sees them.  Their images are explicitly nightmarish: zombies who will eat our flesh, old people who will castrate us for eternity.  Bill Maher, who donated one million dollars to Obama's campaign, just warned us, "If you're thinking about voting for Mitt Romney, I would like to make this one plea: black people know who you are, and they will come after you."
I find it so fitting that Obama is ending his reign by exhorting his followers to get "revenge."  Right from the start, the smiling messiah was always surrounded by a pulsating aura of violence.  "If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun," he said.  And "my administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks."  And "we're going to punish our enemies and reward our friends."
And so, as the date of Obama's electoral humiliation nears, the Twitter-verse is exploding with riot threats.  Many of these illiterate curses are echoing the debased language of  "Special Adviser to the President" Kareem Dale.  Ordinary Americans now worry, with good reason, that violence will be unleashed against us as punishment for waking up from our Hopium illusions.
Whatever happens, be strong and of good courage.  The man who set out to "fundamentally transform" the country, accompanied by a wife who had never been proud of America, can no longer hypnotize us into doing his will.
Our long Obama nightmare is almost over.  The restoration of the American dream is about to begin.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/our_long_obama_nightmare_is_almost_over.html#ixzz2BJiiDKQH

The Choice...

By

“Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not and in a way that Bill Clinton did not.” That was Barack Obama in 2008. And he was right. Reagan was an ideological inflection point, ending a 50-year liberal ascendancy and beginning a 30-year conservative ascendancy.

It is common for one party to take control and enact its ideological agenda. Ascendancy, however, occurs only when the opposition inevitably regains power and then proceeds to accept the basic premises of the preceding revolution.
Thus, Republicans railed for 20 years against the New Deal. Yet when they regained the White House in 1953, they kept the New Deal intact.
And when Nixon followed LBJ’s Great Society — liberalism’s second wave — he didn’t repeal it. He actually expanded it. Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), gave teeth to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and institutionalized affirmative action — major adornments of contemporary liberalism.
Until Reagan. Ten minutes into his presidency, Reagan declares that “government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.” Having thus rhetorically rejected the very premise of the New Deal/Great Society, he sets about attacking its foundations — with radical tax reduction, major deregulation, a frontal challenge to unionism (breaking the air traffic controllers for striking illegally) and an (only partially successful) attempt at restraining government growth.
Reaganism’s ascendancy was confirmed when the other guys came to power and their leader, Bill Clinton, declared (in his 1996 State of the Union address) that “the era of big government is over” — and then abolished welfare, the centerpiece “relief” program of modern liberalism.
In Britain, the same phenomenon: Tony Blair did to Thatcherism what Clinton did to Reaganism. He made it the norm.
Obama’s intention has always been to re-normalize, to reverse ideological course, to be the anti-Reagan — the author of a new liberal ascendancy. Nor did he hide his ambition. In his February 2009 address to Congress he declared his intention to transform America. This was no abstraction. He would do it in three areas: health care, education and energy.
Think about that. Health care is one-sixth of the economy. Education is the future. And energy is the lifeblood of any advanced country — control pricing and production, and you’ve controlled the industrial economy.
And it wasn’t just rhetoric. He enacted liberalism’s holy grail: the nationalization of health care. His $830 billion stimulus, by far the largest spending bill in U.S. history, massively injected government into the free market — lavishing immense amounts of tax dollars on favored companies and industries in a naked display of industrial policy.
And what Obama failed to pass through Congress, he enacted unilaterally by executive action. He could not pass cap-and-trade, but his EPA is killing coal. (No new coal-fired power plant would ever be built.) In 2006, liberals failed legislatively to gut welfare’s work requirement. Obama’s new Health and Human Services rule does that by fiat. Continued in a second term, it would abolish welfare reform as we know it — just as in a second term, natural gas will follow coal, as Obama’s EPA regulates fracking into noncompetitiveness.
Government grows in size and power as the individual shrinks into dependency. Until the tipping point where dependency becomes the new norm — as it is in Europe, where even minor retrenchment of the entitlement state has led to despair and, for the more energetic, rioting.
An Obama second term means that the movement toward European-style social democracy continues, in part by legislation, in part by executive decree. The American experiment — the more individualistic, energetic, innovative, risk-taking model of democratic governance — continues to recede, yielding to the supervised life of the entitlement state.
If Obama loses, however, his presidency becomes a historical parenthesis, a passing interlude of overreaching hyper-liberalism, rejected by a center-right country that is 80 percent nonliberal.
Should they summon the skill and dexterity, Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan could guide the country to the restoration of a more austere and modest government with more restrained entitlements and a more equitable and efficient tax code. Those achievements alone would mark a new trajectory — a return to what Reagan started three decades ago.
Every four years we are told that the coming election is the most important of one’s life. This time it might actually be true. At stake is the relation between citizen and state, the very nature of the American social contract.
letters@charleskrauthammer.com

On Tolerating Law that is Not Obligatory on the Legislature...

Bruce Johnson

 
The promise of what was to be our form of government, and how it would rest on several pillars of lucid and just arrangements between itself and the People, should never be broken.  But it has been.
Part of the Promise was this.
"The House of Representatives . . . can make no law which will not have its full operation on themselves and their friends, as well as on the great mass of the society. . . . If it be asked, what is to restrain the House of Representatives from making legal discriminations in favor of themselves and a particular class of the society? I answer: the genius of the whole system; the nature of just and constitutional laws; and above all, the vigilant and manly spirit which actuates the people of America, a spirit which nourishes freedom, and in return is nourished by it. ....If this spirit shall ever be so far debased as to tolerate a law not obligatory on the legislature, as well as on the people, the people will be prepared to tolerate any thing but liberty."  (James Madison Federalist Papers #57)
The insult to the People with the passing the Affordable Care Act by Congressmen who admit to not having read, much less understood the legislation is too much to bear. To additionally realize that they themselves are exempt from this legislation is the greatest affront.  Their casual voting and lack of regard for the ramifications of this bill, with all the rationing of care and regulation lay upon the People, most likely assisted its passage.
Here is where the old document, the Constitution, could take a deep breath.  It could come alive and be the living document so often talked about, just long enough to allow its amendment.  Then it can return to its hibernation. 
This country looks the other way when such promises as Madison made are violated.  In a Presidential campaign, the subject is not even broached.  Who would oppose such a common sense amendment that would bind the legislators to their own legislation?
Progressives delight in any fissure that can be created in the Constitution that demonstrates its fragility.  This violation of the Madison promise is really knocking a support pin out of the mechanism.  Though never clearly defined in the Constitution, it certainly was an implied, agreed upon and mostly unspoken requirement of the new government.  It was fundamental to the Revolution itself.
With the Electoral College likely to be scrutinized once again, and with the continued sponsorship of peculiar international treaties, such as gun laws, that would supposedly trump our constitutional rights, our guard must be up.  Our guard on our Constitution must remain up and firm. Slippages and fissures of the past decades must be repaired even if it requires an amendment.  It is fundamental to the United States of America that legislators not pass for royalty, that law be universally applied amongst populace and Congressmen alike.